CALENDAR
August 21, 2008
  Court Room practices and conduct; do’s and don’ts
December 04, 2008
  Our 14th proud year of service to the members and the community
 more...
Real Property

A General Guide to Tax Deferred Exchanges
By: P. Patrick Ashouri, Esq.

Identification

Why are the identification rules so time restrictive? Is there any flexibility within them?

The current identification rules represent a compromise which was proposed by the IRS and adopted in 1984. Prior to that time there were no time related guidelines. The current forty-five day provision was created to eliminate questions about the time period for identification and there is absolutely no flexibility written into the rule and no extensions are available.

In a delayed exchange, is there any limit to property value when identifying by using the two hundred percent rule?

Yes. Although you may identify any three properties of any value under the three property rule, when using the two hundred percent rule there is a restriction. It is when identifying four or more properties, the total aggregate value of the properties identified must not exceed more than two hundred percent of the value of the relinquished property.

An additional exception exists for those whose identification does not qualify under the three property or two hundred percent rules. The ninety-five percent exception allows the identification of any number of properties, provided the total aggregate value of the properties acquired total at least ninety-five percent of the properties identified.

Should identifications be made to the intermediary or an attorney, escrow or title company?

Identifications may be made to any party listed above. However, many times the escrow holder is not equipped to receive your identification if they have not yet opened an escrow. Therefore it is easier and safer to identify through the intermediary provided the identification is postmarked or received within the forty-five day identification period.

Prepare Your Exchange

  • Determine whether the property being sold and consideration received qualifies for deferred gain treatment under §1031 of the Code, (e.g. interest in real estate vs. partnership; purchase agreement vs. the right to purchase property (option); fee simple vs. lease; cash vs. promissory note).
  • Determine whether existing ownership of the relinquished property is suitable to accomplish the exchange, (e.g. partnership vs. co-ownership; individual vs. husband and wife; individual ownership vs. trustee ownership). In other words, ask the following question: Will the ownership of the replacement property be the same as the relinquished property?
  • Determine what types or kinds of replacement property are suitable investments and determine whether or not that type of investment will qualify as replacement property under §1031 of the Code.
  • Determine the minimum requirements for deferring the gain on the sale/exchange of the relinquished property, (i.e. equal or greater fair market value (“fmv”) plus investment of all of the cash or other proceeds for the sale).
  • Determine the contemplated ownership or vesting of the replacement property and verify whether the contemplated form of ownership will permit the qualification of the exchange under the provisions and regulations under § 1031 of the Code.
  • Determine whether you will be contributing additional cash to acquire the replacement property and whether you will be requesting the return of your personal deposit for the replacement property acquisition.
  • Determine your lender requirements for the acquisition of the replacement property. This pertains to the form of ownership (e.g. single member limited liability company, husband and wife, etc.)
P. Patrick Ashouri, Esq.


   1  |   2  |   3  |   4  |   5  |   6  |   7  |   8  |   9  |   10  |   11  |